The Problem
Most of us
are an accident away from becoming homeless. Or an illness away. Or a job
loss away.
Anyone can become homeless.
Only 15% of the homeless are those
individuals we so often think of as “the homeless.” Most are families. Usually
one parent families. The average age is nine.
Remember the
scruffy man on the street corner holding the barely legible cardboard sign: “Will work for food?” Even if you stopped and bought him a meal, you know that’s
not a real long-term solution. Right?
So, what is?
The Solution
More and
more states and cities are finding that by offering the homeless places to
live of their own, not only helps these unfortunate individuals, it also saves
the city and state money—a lot of money.
Huffington
Post recently reported that Camden, N.J. will be providing apartments to the
homeless. Those who have jobs will pay a portion of their rent.
The state of
Utah has been providing permanent housing and case management services to their
homeless population for about ten years.
This program has reduced their homeless
population by 72% and has saved the state a bundle of money.
How is that
possible?
Here’s how:
In Utah, a
homeless person living in shelters and eating at soup kitchens costs taxpayers
$19,200 per year. The cost includes emergency room visits, health care, jail,
and other expenses that are paid by taxpayers.
To provide
that homeless person with a permanent home and case management services costs
the taxpayers $7800 per year—a savings of $11,400 per person per year.
In Florida
they found that a similar program saved the taxpayers about $21,000 per
homeless person per year.
The National
Alliance to End Homelessness states that providing homes for the homeless
should take priority over other services.
Think about it: how much harder would
it be to deal with an addiction problem or getting cleaned up for a job
interview if you’re living on the streets.
Persons who are homeless spend more time in jail which is very
costly to local and state governments. Often, they are in jail for “crimes”
that target the homeless such as loitering, sleeping in public places, and
asking passersby for a handout.
Emergency
shelter is a costly alternative to permanent housing.
Studies have shown that, in real dollars, providing people
experiencing chronic homelessness with permanent supportive housing saves
taxpayers money.
A few examples:
A few examples:
·
Seattle—a savings of $2,449 per person per
month when homeless persons with severe alcohol problems and other medical and
mental health issues were placed in residences instead of conventional
shelters.
· Rural Portland, ME—found significant cost
reductions when providing permanent supportive housing as opposed to serving
the people while they remain homeless.
· Los
Angeles—found that placing four chronically homeless people into
permanent supportive housing saved the city more than $80,000 per year.
What You Can Do?
Check out
National Alliance to End Homelessness.
The Alliance provides
trainings, toolkits, webinars, and guides designed to provide practitioners and
community leaders with skills and strategies to successfully understand and
implement rapid re-housing as part of a larger, system-wide approach to ending
homelessness.
Do we want to pass laws that throw people in jail for sitting on
the sidewalk, or develop programs that can make homeless citizens into productive
citizens and save money at the same time?
What are your thoughts?